Prophecies About Prophet Muhammad By Prophet Enoch

(Cite: Khan, Dr. (Mufti) Imran & Hamdani, Mufti Shah Rafi Uddin. (2018), Prophecies About Prophet Muhammad By Prophet Enoch , Encyclopedia of Muhammad , Seerat Research Center, Karachi, Pakistan, Vol. 1, Pg. 103-104.)

1. When Jesus refers to himself as the "son of man", he is usually described as the Son of man's fate on earth. "son of man" refers to the humanity of Jesus meaning "human" in English. It is not a respectful appellation, but a humbling one.
2. "Soil of maul" is a translation of Aramaic Bar nahsa. Although it etymologically means "son of man", its meaning at Christ's time was only "man". Although the Evangelists (writers of the Gospels) knew this, they translated it into "Son of man". It evidently hints that Jesus is the Messianic Son of the man referred in Daniel
   ١٣ «كُنْتُ أَرَى فِي رُؤَى ٱللَّيْلِ وَإِذَا مَعَ سُحُبِ ٱلسَّمَاءِ مِثْلُ ٱبْنِ إِنْسَانٍ أَتَى وَجَاءَ إِلَى ٱلْقَدِيمِ ٱلْأَيَّامِ، فَقَرَّبُوهُ قُدَّامَهُ. ⁷²
   translation :I saw in the night-visions, and, behold, one like the Son of man came with the clouds of heaven, and came to the Ancient of days, and they brought him near before him. (KJV)
3. When Jesus describes himself as the "son of man", he is saying that he is just human-probably a generalisation meaning "I" or "one". Geza Vermes is a professor emeritus of Jewish studies at Wolfson College, Oxford. He suggests that the term originates in Aramaic, bar nash/bar nasha and it is based on his study of Aramaic sources, concludes that in these sources: "son of man" (i) is a regular expression for man in general; (ii) often serves as an indefinite pronoun ("one" or "someone"); and (iii) may be employed as a circumlocution, implying awe, reserve, or modesty. In none of the extant text does "son of man" figure as a title. ⁷³
4. According to the Jewish Encyclopaedia, "son of man" applies to humankind in general, as opposed to and distinct from the non-human relationship. Moreover, to accentuate the difference between God and human beings. It occurs most frequently, however, as a synonym for "mankind", the human race". Similarly, in Aramaic, "son of man" is the usual designation for "man" and occurs in the inscriptions in Syrian, Mandaic, Talmudic, and other dialects. Among Jews, the term "son of man" was not used as the specific title of the Messiah. The New Testament expression is a translation of the Aramaic bar nasha, and as such could have been understood only as the substitute for a personal pronoun, or as emphasising the human qualities of those to whom it is applied. Most of the recent writers (among them being II. Lietzmann) have come to the conclusion that Jesus, speaking Aramaic, could never have designated himself as the "son of man" in a Messianic, mystic sense, because the Aramaic term never implied this meaning. The Greek translators coined the phrase, which then led, under the influence of Daniel 7: 13 and the Logos Gospel, to the theological construction of the title which is basic to the Christology of the Church. Indeed, examination of many of the passages shows that in the mouth of Jesus , the term was an equivalent for the personal pronoun "I".
5. John Dominic Crossan (1934) is an Irish-American religious scholar and former Catholic priest. He is known for co-founding the Jesus Seminar, and a major figure in the fields of biblical archaeology, anthropology and New Testament textual and higher criticism. He argues that all the appellations or titles of "Divine", "son of God", "God", "God from God", "Lord", "Redeemer", "Liberator", and "Savior of the World" ever existed before Jesus and belonged to Caesar the Augustus. They were later adopted by the early Christians to apply them to Jesus as denying them of Caesar the Augustus. Therefore, Crossan is of the opinion that while Jesus may have used the name to refer to himself in the sense of "a human being", the use of it as a reference to a divine figure was put in Jesus' mouth by his followers.
6. Ed Parish Sanders (1937), a New Testament scholar and Arts and Sciences Professor of Religion, concludes that Jesus used the name "son of man". He expected the "son of man" to come from heaven, but it is not certain that he identified himself as that future "Son of man". Sanders even goes on to argue that the more explicit claims of Jesus as expected "son of man" are later interpolations.
7. Another argument concerning "son of man" is that Jesus could not have referred to himself in the third person so often if he had wanted to apply the various Divine titles and claims to himself. Albert Schweitzer (1875-1965), a theologian and philosopher, for example, took the third-person references to indicate that Jesus as speaking of someone other than himself. ^74757677

Enoch prophesised about the arrival of Prophet Muhammad and used the prolific term of “lord” for him. According to his prophecy, Lord will come in the last period, and will have some distinctive traits. His prophecies signifies that the Lord who is to come is no other but Prophet Muhammad .

وَتَنَبَّأَ عَنْ هَؤُلَاءِ أَيْضًا أَخْنُوخُ السَّابِعُ مِنْ آدَمَ قَائِلًا: هُوَذَا قَدْ جَاءَ ٱلرَّبُّ فِي رَبَوَاتِ قِدِّيسِيهِ، لِيَصْنَعَ دَيْنُونَةً عَلَى ٱلْجَمِيعِ، وَيُعَاقِبَ جَمِيعَ فُجَّارِهِمْ عَلَى جَمِيعِ أَعْمَالِ فُجُورِهِمْ ٱلَّتِي فَجَرُوا بِهَا، وَعَلَى جَمِيعِ ٱلْكَلِمَاتِ ٱلصَّعْبَةِ ٱلَّتِي تَكَلَّمَ بِهَا عَلَيْهِ خُطَاةٌ فُجَّارٌ. ¹

It was Enoch, the seventh direct descendant from Adam, who long ago prophesied this about them: “The Lord will come with many thousands of his holy angels to bring judgment on all, to condemn them all for the godless deeds they have performed and for all the terrible words that godless sinners have spoken against him!”

The given verses of the Bible indicate one historical event of the world’s history which is never accomplished in the regime of any of the prophet of Allah in the same way except in the time of Prophet Muhammad

It was the time when, after the conquest of Makkah, Prophet Muhammad entered into the city with his ten thousand companions who were saints and beloved of Allah as the Holy Quran states:

جَزَاؤُهُمْ عِندَ رَبِّهِمْ جَنَّاتُ عَدْنٍ تَجْرِي مِن تَحْتِهَا الْأَنْهَارُ خَالِدِينَ فِيهَا أَبَدًا رَّضِيَ اللَّهُ عَنْهُمْ وَرَضُوا عَنْهُ ذَٰلِكَ لِمَنْ خَشِيَ رَبَّهُ 8²

Indeed, those who accepted faith and did good deeds – it is they who are the best among the creation. Their reward is – with their Lord – Everlasting Gardens of Eden beneath which rivers flow, in which they will abide for ever and ever; Allah is pleased with them, and they are pleased with Him; this is for one who fears his Lord.

The Holy Prophet delivered his sermon at the time of the conquest of Makkah and gave his judgment to forgive all his opponents. He forgave all of his mortal enemies despite having received their ungodly deeds throughout his life and their hard words which they have spoken to him. It is mentioned in the ahadith of the conquest of Makkah that the Holy Prophet said when he was entering to Makkah as a conqueror that:

من دخل دار أبي سفيان فهو آمن، ومن ألقى السلاح فهو آمن، ومن أغلق بابه فهو آمن. ³

"Whoever enters the house of Abu Sufyan will be safe. Whoever throws down his arms will be safe. Whoever locks his door will be safe."

All the given details prove that the real manifestation and exhibition of these two verses of the Bible, which are taken from the letter of Jude is Prophet Muhammad . Those Christian scholars who try to apply these on Jesus , they manipulate the historical facts because all the students of history know that Jesus never had ten thousand people with him. He was not in the position to give his judgment against ungodly sinners and to those who spoke against him in his lifetime.

• ¹  The Bible, Jude 1: 14-15
• ²  Holy Quran, Al-Bayyinah (The Clear Proof) 98: 8
• ³  Muslim bin Al-Hajjaj Abul Hassan Al-Neshapuri (2000), Sahih Muslim, Kitab-ul-Jihad, Hadith: 4624, Darussalam, Saudia, Pg. 794.
• ⁷²  The Bible, Daniel 7: 13, King James Version
• ⁷³  Quoted by Ali Unal in The Prophet Promised in World Scriptures, Tughra Books, New Jersey, USA, Pg. 318.
• ⁷⁴  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Son_of_man: Retrieved: 03-03-2017
• ⁷⁵  http://www.jewishencyclopedia.com/articles/13913-son-of-man: Retrieved: 03-03-2017
• ⁷⁶  John Dominic Crossan writing in God and Empire: Jesus Against Rome, Then and Now (2007), quoted in http://www.newworldencyclopedia.org/entry/Son_of_God: Retrieved: 03-03-2017
• ⁷⁷  http://www.tektonics.org/jesusclaims/sonofman.php: Retrieved: 03-03-2017